李克强强调，中国经济升级发展根本靠改革创新。下面是小编给大家整理的中国经济相关的英语作文，供大家参阅!

中国经济相关的英语作文篇1：Chinese economic development

中国经济发展

当今社会，伴随着科技快速发展，我国经济形势蒸蒸日上。紧跟我国建设有中国特色社会主义的步伐，在党中央的领导下，我国经济建设的各方各面都取得了巨大成就。

我们完成了诸多造福百姓的巨大工程，例如西部大开发，南水北调等等。在居民的日常生活中，用水用电都更加方便快捷，出行选择也多种多样，极大提高了人民的生活质量。每一个孩子都有书读有学上，学校硬件设施更加优越，对贫困学生的资助也愈趋完善，他们再也不用为学费发愁。不论生活在城市还是农村的老人都享有养老保险，再加上改革的社会保障制度，使他们都能安享晚年。

和平与发展已成为当今世界的主题，我国的国际地位不断提高，对世界经济发展产生巨大影响。加入世界贸易组织，我国的经济政策牵动着世界的一呼一吸。成功举办奥运会和世博会，让世界为中国经济喝彩。

总之，中国经济飞速发展，已经取得了辉煌成就。在我们的不懈努力下，中国经济的明天一定更加美好。

Chinese economic development

Nowadays, with the fast development of technology, we can see that our economics developed very quickly. We have made big economic achievements in many aspects under the lead of our party.

There are countless programs making benefits for common people, such as large-scale development of the western region and South-to-North Water Diversion Project. We have easier access to water and electric power in daily life, and we have more choices when traveling. Every child can go to school and get an education in better school facilities. They don’t need to worry about their tuition fees with proper assistance. Old people have assurances no matter where he lives, and they can enjoy their life with the reformed social safety net.

Peace and development have become the theme of world. Our country’s international status keeps on improving, and we make great influences on the world economy. Joining in the WTO, our economic policies control the breath of world. Successfully holding the Olympic games and the world EXPO make the world give us more attention and respect.

In a word, Chinese economic develops at an amazing speed and has made encouraging breakthroughs. I believe that the tomorrow of our economy will be brighter as long as we try our best effort.

中国经济相关的英语作文篇2：No Growth Without Fit Environment

中国经济发展需要良好环境

在上世纪90年代中期以前，只有专家才意识到在中国不断恶化的环境问题与经济发展之间的关系。而政府部门并没有充分关注经济发展所带来的生态问题。社会大众亦没有察觉到生态环境是生产力的一个根本因素。直到1998年，长江流域突发洪灾，政府高层官员才强烈意识到生态保护的重要性。因此，政府出台环境保护相关政策，例如退耕还林还草。然而，生态恶化的程度远远高于这次长江洪灾。

高速发展的中国经济正面临着“新经济结构危机”，即严重缺乏相关于生产力的生态资源及必要因素。以出口为例，中国制造的商品在国际市场价格低廉，然而最大程度上来说，低廉的价格是以牺牲环境为代价的。在当今的生态环境下，进一步的经济增长必须以大规模的“制造”必要因素为方向来保护生态环境。这就意味着我们必须弥补过去几十年对环境造成的巨大损失以及消除因过度开发而导致的生态泡沫。

从科技上来说，严重的生态问题源于三个方面：资源消耗快速增长;资源利用效率低下;资源循环率底。

关于资源消耗，中国的消耗增长率可谓惊人。例如，国家钢材消耗在1983年为3000万吨，到2003年飙升到2亿5000万吨，20年内增长8倍，占世界总消耗量的40%。水泥消耗大约为8000吨，1983年后也增长8倍，占世界总消耗量的50%。能源消耗超过日本，仅次于美国。未来，中国工业结构任然保持以重工业和化工业为主，高能耗高污染工业任占据统治地位。

因此，中国必须大力提高提高资源利用率，加大资源循环，加强废品的回收利用，来实现经济快速发展，同时不增加甚至减少原始资源的消耗，不增加甚至减少污染排放，不破坏甚至保护自然环境。这些就是循环经济的技术性特征。

毫无疑问发展循环经济是一项基本的方法，来解决快速的经济增长和不断恶化的环境之间的矛盾。它也是唯一合理的方法来避免在经济发展中的生态泡沫和新经济结构危机。经济发展需要良好的环境，经济增长与环境优化并存才是人类文明进步的标志。

No Growth Without Fit Environment

Prior to the mid-1990s, only specialists in China were aware of the relationship between the deteriorating environment and economic growth. Government departments failed to pay enough attention to the ecological issue brought about by economic development. The public also had no sense of seeing the ecological environment as an essential factor of production. Only in 1998 when flood disasters occurred in the Yangtze River Valley, did top government officials have a stronger sense of the

need for ecological protection. Thereafter, policies concerning environmental protection were formulated, such as restoring cultivated land to forests and grassland. However, the degree of the ecological deterioration is far beyond that of the Yangtze River flood.

The rapid growth of the Chinese economy is facing a “new structural crisis” that is highly short of ecological resources and essential factors for production. Taking exports for example, the price of Chinese-made commodities is very low in international markets, but the low price, to a great extent, is at the cost of sacrificing the environment. Under the current ecological situation, further economic growth must be oriented toward large-scale “production” of essential factors to protect the ecological environment. This means that we must make up for the huge damage caused to the environment in the past several decades, and eliminate economic bubbles caused by its overuse.

In regard to technology, the serious ecological problem stems from three aspects: The fast growth of resources consumption; low efficiency of resources utilization; and low rate of resource recycle.

In regard to resource consumption, China’s growth rate of consumption is surprising. For example, the country’s steel consumption in 1983 was 30 million tons, but soared to 250 million tons in 2003, up eight-fold in 20 years, or accounting for 40 percent of the world’s total

consumption volume. The cement consumption is about 800 million tons, a rise of eight-fold over 1983, or making up 50 percent of the world’s total. Power consumption has exceeded Japan, ranking second in the world to the United States. The future sees China’s industrial structure remaining in a stage with heavy and chemical industries as the mainstay, and high energy consuming and high polluting industries continuing to dominate.

Therefore, China must energetically raise its resource utilization rate, improve the recycling of resources, stress reprocessing and use of waste products, so as to realize rapid growth of its economy while not increasing or even reducing the consumption of primitive resources, not increasing or even reducing pollutant discharge and not damaging or even restoring the environment. These are the technical features of a cycle economy.

No doubt developing a cycle economy is a fundamental way to solve the contradiction between rapid economic growth and the increasingly deteriorated environment. It is the only logical way to eliminate the ecological bubbles and new structural crisis in the economic growth. Economic growth needs fit environment. Only the coexistence of rapid economic growth and continuing upgrading environment is the symbol of progress of human civilization.

中国经济相关的英语作文篇3：经济发展与环境保护

Which should receive priority in china ，economic growth or environmental protection?

正方一辩：从人类发展的终极目标看，我们要彻底地解决环境问题，必须要标本

兼治。要治本，必须优先发展经济，从根本上优化经济结构堵住产生环境问题的源头，要治标，同样要优先发展经济，为解决眼前的环境问题提供技术、资金等支持，只有这样，才能为人类生存和发展提供环境保障。

From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly. To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems;To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the

technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems. Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.

反方一辩：经济发展是指社会能够提供丰裕的商品来改善人类的物质生活,环境

保护则是采取一定的政策措施来保护生态平衡。经济要发展意味着企业需要更多的厂房与原材料来保障商品的供应——那便存在一个问题：自然分给人类的土地与原材料是有限,经济优先发展就一定会侵占原本不属于人类的自然资源。

The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life; environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance. economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.

二辩盘问 Two debate questioned

反方二辩：请问对方二辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要?经济

发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗?

My fellow debaters ，please allow me to ask. The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice; how can we still survive if there is no environment.

正方二辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。并不是说经

济优先就不搞环保了，只是环保处于较次的位置，跟中国现状一样，政策虽然说要重视环保，但一般县区还是经济发展优先的，也就有资本的大城市才比较重视搞环保，相信大家心知肚明

Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority. Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental

protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position .Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.

反方二辩：请问正方三辩，如果发展经济优先的话，很可能造成环境成本大于经济效益的情况，这样的经济是发展还是倒退?

Excuse me, my fellow debaters. If economic development receives priority then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辩：这种情况确实有存在，但并不是每时每刻都存在。各个行业情况不同，

我们不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，这种情况下经济效益是负的，那我们改行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈?我不这么觉得。

This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment. The situation in each industry is different; we cannot draw conclusions from one part. But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.

正方二辩： 我们知道环境的保护是预防为主，防治结合，而预防和治理都要依

靠技术的发展，那请问对方二辩，如果没有强有力的经济基础支持科学技术发展，那么以科技为支撑的环保从何谈起呢?

We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology

development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.

反方二辩：你的问题未免抽象了点。科技发展无止尽，经济发展也没尽头，什么时候算得上是“强有力”呢?但是环境保护是迫在眉睫，耽误不起。

Your question is a little abstract. Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.

正方二辩：请问反方三辩，经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活内容，包括衣食住行娱乐，这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗?

Excuse me, my fellow debaters. The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire?

反方三辩：人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人们更倾向于在一个既

能享受到生活乐趣，同时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存。

People`s expectation is not necessarily that good. I believe that people

tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

自由辩论

正方一辩：请问对方辩友，原始社会的人类祖先们环境保护工作做得可谓好了吧，

而他们

经济发展很落后，所所以才一直过着钻木取火、茹毛饮血的生活，按你们的

意思我们应该回归这种生活吗?

Excuse me, my fellow friends .In the primitive society, human ancestor`s

environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should

we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

反方一辩：人类祖先确实需要发展经济，但若是在这个过程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也无法发展下去了。我想问的是，核电站是

经济发展的产物，但众所周知，几次核电站的泄漏带来了环境的极度恶化，请问你怎么看?

Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the

forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer. What I

want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic

development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage

has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?

正方二辩：首先，我方并没有承诺经济发展就一定会破坏到环境;其次，对方所

说的情况只是凤毛麟角;第三，核电站泄漏是科技不力，而经济是科学研究

的基础。

First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy

the environment; second, the situation you said is only rare; third, nuclear

power station leakage because the technology is not strong. But economy is the

foundation of scientific research.

反方二辩：但是核电站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么办?没有了这

些，我们的生活怎么办?你愿意生活在核电站附近，还是一片山清水秀之

间?

But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how

does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power

station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?

正方三辩：但是对方辩友请注意，核电站的建造，正是为了千千万万人类的生活

用电得到满足。有了电，我们的机器可以运作，生产可以兴起，环境总会有

办法弥补，我也想问，你愿意生活在两小时停一次电的地方还是用电无忧之

处?

Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy

millions of people's living power. With the electricity, our machine can be

operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment. I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.

反方三辩：你的意思是破坏了环境然后再去弥补。为什么要先污染后治理?为什

么要兜这么大一个圈子呢?而且我国的经济建设里程已经证明，先污染后治理是错的，行不通的。

You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it. Why

management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the

economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.

正方四辩：我不得不说我方真冤枉。是你给的前提，说核电站泄漏了，严重污染

了环境，而我方坚信是可以挽救的。而且事实上，包括核电站在内的很多工业厂子，都种有青草绿树，他们在搞经济的同时，并没有放弃环境的保护。 I can not but say that we are really undeserved. It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved. And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.

反方四辩：但是仅仅不放弃就可以吗?再怎么注意也无法保证无污染，这样日积

月累下来，依然会是一片惨状。必须把环境保护放在第一位，每个工厂都严抓，才能从根本上阻止环境的恶化。

But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the

environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution. As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation. So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening

fundamentally.

正方三辩：对方辩友请从事实出发，经济发展必然会付出代价，我们已经在努力

使代价降到最低。

Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.

反方三辩：降低应该有个标准吧，这不是你我能定的，是自然环境定的，等到他

揭示这个标准时，只怕为时已晚了。

Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.

四辩总结

正方四辩：首先，我是一个支持环保的人，拥有一个健康的生态环境是可持续发

展得以进行的前提。但是，如果一味的保护环境，而忽视经济发展，那么对于经济的发展不利，对于人们生活水平的提高也同样不利。同时，我也必须强调，经济发展绝对不是破坏环境，那样的发展，也是违背自然规律的。在发展经济的同时，我们要兼顾治理环境，才是当今可持续发展经济的理念。 First, I am a supporter of environmental protection. Having a healthy

ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development. But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard. At the same time, I must stress that the

economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law. While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the

concept of sustainable economic development.

反方四辩：过去的发展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，结果呢，环境问题突

出，局部地区已经到了威胁生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成本高，而且治理效果也不理想，处于一种被动的境地。因此，必须从源头开始防止污染，也就是发展过程首先考虑对环境的影响，只有这样，才能有望在将来解决环境问题。

The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival; Furthermore,

management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is

inefficient, sometimes in a passive position. Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development process. Only in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.

英语辩论——环境保护 VS 经济发展(经济发展正方) Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth. 正 方 陈 词 ： Good morning everyone! We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s environment growth that should be chosen. I have three reasons to prove this point. First, as a developing country, the economy power is far

behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries. So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy. Second, economy growth doesn’t

necessarily conflict with environment protection. We can develop our economy without environment pollution. Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win. In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China. 反方陈词：We agree economic growth is needed. But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’

environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence. What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much. By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position. At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban

conservation and the environment. So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past. That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority. Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably. That’s all I want to say. 自由辩论 正方二辩：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live. Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our

economies? 反方二辩：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present . Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high .But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly. We have money, but being under the sub health condition. Does it make any sense, opponent debaters? 正方三辩：There do exist some eastern cities whose

economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people. The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China. We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research. They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy. I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong

economy strength. 反 方 三 辩 ： Environmental protection needs economy . But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth. If you drink

polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection. The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment. Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important? 正方：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy. We admit our country has paid a lot of

money for the environment even sacrificing the profit .But we should still take economic construction as the central task. 反方： admit economic construction is our country’s principle task .But we have to insist We on sustainable

development while developing economy. We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic

development. 总结： 正方总结：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth” .I think what they said can’t come true at present . It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy. 反方总结: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy” .The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . If the economic growth lead to the

pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises. As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration. Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become

strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy. If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it .But, if the

environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the

resources will exhaust. The urgency like this can’t wait. So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China. Thank you