为了帮助考生们更好地复习雅思考试,网为各位考生整理了雅思考试大作文范文，供考生们参考使用。

雅思大作文范文：新建筑是否应延续传统风格

The culture of a country changes in the course ofsocial development. This is what is happening indeveloping nations such as China. Government hasthe obligation to preserve the culture of a countryin a proper way.

In the real-estate business, for example, developers build houses, apartments , and officesto meet the demands of consumers differing in taste and spending power. Some buildings arebuilt in traditional style as a selling point to differentiate from competing products. In somecases, a municipal government tries to give its city a unique aroma by constructing buildings inold style.

However, such newly built "old" buildings appear strikingly different from the originalscenturies old. On the campus of Peking University, we can easily tell the differences between theold and the new. Even we admire the university's efforts, this is not a work beautifully done.More examples would be found in many architects that are ridiculed by both consumers andcritics.

The real issue is: could culture be replicated? If yes, then to what extent do buildingsrepresent a culture? In China, the more commonly known architect styles are found in templesor palaces. Though the government tries to recreate such places, people often label them asfake.

In spite of the disadvantages in government's efforts in cultural preservation, we have torecognize that such endeavor reminds people of their unique identity and legacy. And itbalances the trend that tries to make everything western just to keep up with the trend.

To sum up, it is very hard or sometimes impossible for the government to create trulygood work in traditional style to preserve a culture. Nonetheless, such efforts are worthybecause of the positive influences they have on people in a country with rich history and culturelike China.

雅思大作文范文：Style of New Buildings

We all know that China's history is a long andcomplex one which stretches over thousands of years. With such a long and varied history,it's hard to accurately define our "cultural identity". For example, in the Tang Dynasty, manypeople thought that fat women were the most beautiful, but now things are different, and mostpeople think that slim girls are prettier. The same is true for building designs; some things thatwere desirable in the past are no longer popular.

I think that, as a country, we have a responsibility to preserve a piece of our past, but thatdoesn't mean that we have to live in the past. Just because my relatives were farmers, doesn'tmean that every future generation has to live in a farmhouse, or even in a house that looks likea farmhouse.

Many modern buildings are safer than old buildings, because we have learned how to makestronger buildings that will last longer. I think that modern buildings that incorporate a subtletraditional style into their design are beautiful, but it's also good for buildings to have a wild,modern, Chinese flavor. Each period of Chinese history is a little different, so we should leaveroom for new expression.

In the future, today's newest designs may well become traditional. Keeping this fact inmind, I agree that some buildings should be built in traditional styles; however, we should alsoallow young Chinese architects to weave the essence of the current era into their buildingdesigns. The government is not only responsible for protecting a nation's cultural identity; italso has a responsibility to allow for continued growth.

雅思大作文范文：旧建筑与新建筑

With the rapid development of urbanization,many people advocate the demolition of oldhouses for the benefit of economic and socialdevelopment. But others argue that we can’t ruinthe traditional cultural heritage. Personally, I sidewith the former opinion.

In the first place, the existence of old houses isan obstacle to modern urbanization by damagingthe image of the city. If they are replaced with modern skyscrapers, the city will take on a newlook. Take the Summer Palace in Beijing for example, Being government has demolished a largenumber of run-down the Summer Palace and constructed many new housing buildings instead.

In the second place, there is a potential danger to people living in old houses or evenpassers-by. If the houses are old enough to collapse in the end, where does the value ofculture or tourism exist? The tourists surely will not travel a long distance to see these so-called“culture heritage” at the risk of their lives.

In the third place, replacing old houses with buildings can help to solve housing problems.It is well-known that China is a densely-populated country and people in urban areas onlyhave little housing space. Undoubtedly, replacing old houses with new buildings is a good wayto solve the problem.

As mentioned above, I can draw a conclusion safely: It is irresistible to replace old houseswith modern buildings. At the same time, it is necessary for us to restore a limited number ofold houses for the sake of conserving traditional culture and attracting tourists.